Nebraska Bankers Association
  • About
    • Membership
    • News
    • Boards and Committees
    • Alice Dittman Trailblazer Award
    • NBA Foundation
    • Leadership Program
    • Staff Directory >
      • Contact Us
  • Workforce
    • Careers
    • Post Job Openings
  • Advocacy
    • Legislative Update
    • BankPAC
    • Comment Letters
  • Compliance
    • Handbook
    • Compliance Update
    • Compliance Alliance
  • Education
    • Event Calendar
    • In-person Events/Training
    • Webinars
    • ABA Training
    • Banking Schools
    • CYBERSECURITY TRAINING
    • Sponsorships and Exhibits
    • Young Bankers (YBON)
  • Insurance
    • Agency Services >
      • Commercial Insurance
      • Personal Insurance
      • Livestock, Irrigation and Farm Insurance
      • Surety Bonds
    • Bank Property & Liability
    • Financial Institution Insurance
    • Benefit Plans
  • Bank Resources
    • Preferred Vendors
    • Associate Members
    • Marketing Resources
    • Financial Literacy
    • Single Bank Pooled ​Collateral Program
    • Bank Security
    • Compensation & Benefits Survey
  • About
    • Membership
    • News
    • Boards and Committees
    • Alice Dittman Trailblazer Award
    • NBA Foundation
    • Leadership Program
    • Staff Directory >
      • Contact Us
  • Workforce
    • Careers
    • Post Job Openings
  • Advocacy
    • Legislative Update
    • BankPAC
    • Comment Letters
  • Compliance
    • Handbook
    • Compliance Update
    • Compliance Alliance
  • Education
    • Event Calendar
    • In-person Events/Training
    • Webinars
    • ABA Training
    • Banking Schools
    • CYBERSECURITY TRAINING
    • Sponsorships and Exhibits
    • Young Bankers (YBON)
  • Insurance
    • Agency Services >
      • Commercial Insurance
      • Personal Insurance
      • Livestock, Irrigation and Farm Insurance
      • Surety Bonds
    • Bank Property & Liability
    • Financial Institution Insurance
    • Benefit Plans
  • Bank Resources
    • Preferred Vendors
    • Associate Members
    • Marketing Resources
    • Financial Literacy
    • Single Bank Pooled ​Collateral Program
    • Bank Security
    • Compensation & Benefits Survey

ABILITY TO REPAY/QUALIFIED MORTGAGES RULE

 I.                  INTRODUCTION

 

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has finalized its ability to repay (ATR) /qualified mortgage (QM) rule amending Regulation Z, which implements the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), to generally require creditors to “make a reasonable, good faith determination of a consumer’s ATR any consumer credit transaction secured by a dwelling.”

 

The rule establishes a 43 percent debt-to-income (DTI) ratio threshold for QMs.  However, the final rule also creates a temporary category of QMs that has more flexible underwriting requirements.  Under the final rule, lenders would be granted a legal safe harbor when they write a QM loan that is also a prime loan.  The CFPB, however, chose to establish a rebuttable presumption of compliance for subprime QMs.

 

Lenders had until January 10, 2014, to comply with the amendments and the final rule.  The final rule applies to transactions covered under the rule for which a bank receives an application on or after January 10, 2014.

 

II.        Covered Loans

 

The CFPB ATR/QM rule applies to almost all closed-end consumer credit transactions secured by a dwelling, including any real property attached to the dwelling.  This means loans made to consumers and secured by residential structures that contain one to four units, including condominiums and co-ops are covered.  The ATR/QM rule is not limited to first liens or to loans on primary residences. 

 

III.       Excluded Loans

 

The final rule does not apply to open-end credit plans (home equity lines of credit, or HELOCs); time-share plans; reverse mortgages; temporary or bridge loans with terms of 12 months or less (with possible renewal); or a construction phase of 12 months or less (with possible renewal) of a construction-to-permanent loan. 

 

IV.       GENERAL ATR STANDARD

 

The CFPB’s ATR/QM rule permits lenders to choose whether to write a loan under the general ATR standard.  In this case, a lender must collect and verify certain information, but there are no restrictions on loan product features.  In the alternative, lenders seeking certain legal protections can choose to write a QM, a type of loan that does not include certain product features and meets other criteria set forth by the CFPB.

 

The ATR standard provides that the creditor shall not make a covered loan unless that creditor makes a reasonable and good faith determination at or before consummation that the consumer will have a reasonable ATR that loan according to its terms.

Four main concepts are built into the ATR standard:  (1) an underwriting concept; (2) verification of information concept; (3) payment on the loan concept; and (4) how a lender would calculate income ratio or residual income.

 

A.        Underwriting

 

At a minimum, creditors generally must consider eight underwriting factors when making an ATR determination:

 

·         current or reasonably expected income or assets (other than the value of the property that secures the loan) that the consumer will rely on to repay the loan;

·         current employment status (if you rely on employment income when assessing the consumer’s ATR);

·         the monthly mortgage payments on the covered transaction (calculated using the introductory or fully-indexed rate, whichever is higher, and monthly, fully amortizing payments that are substantially equal);

·         the monthly payment on any simultaneous loans secured by the same property;

·         the monthly payment for mortgage-related obligations (property taxes and insurance that you require the consumer to buy, and certain other costs related to the property such as homeowners association fees or ground rent);

·         current debt obligations, alimony and child support;

·         the monthly debt-to-income ratio or residual income, calculated using the total of all of the mortgage and non-mortgage obligations listed above, as a ratio of gross monthly income; and

·         credit history.

 

Under the CFPB’s guidance, as long as a creditor complies with the rule, the creditor is permitted to use its own definitions and other underwriting criteria.  However, a creditor must ensure that its underwriting criteria, as applied to the facts and circumstances of a particular extension of credit, result in a reasonable, good faith determination of a consumer’s ATR.

 

Some of the types of factors that may reflect that your ATR determination was reasonable and in good faith include: 

 

·         Underwriting standards:  standards used to underwrite the transaction that have historically resulted in comparatively low rates of delinquency and default during adverse economic conditions.

·         Payment history:  the consumer paid on time for a significant time after origination or reset of an adjustable-rate mortgage.

 

Among the types of factors that may show that your ATR determination was not reasonable and in good faith:

·         Underwriting standards:  evidence that the underwriting standards used are not effective at determining consumers’ repayment ability was ignored.

·         Inconsistency:  underwriting standards were applied inconsistently or the underwriting standards used differed from those you used for similar loans without having a reasonable justification.

·         Payment history:  the consumer defaults early in the loan, or shortly after the loan resets, without having experienced a significant financial challenge or life-altering event.

 

The reasonableness and good faith of your determination of ATR depends on the facts and circumstances relevant to the particular loan.  For example, a particular ATR determination may be reasonable and in good faith even though the consumer defaulted shortly after consummation if, for example, the consumer experienced a sudden and unexpected loss of income.

 

If the records you review indicate there will be a change in the consumers’ repayment ability after consummation (for example, they plan to retire and not obtain new employment, or they plan to transition from full-time to part-time work) you must consider that information.  However, you may not make inquiries or verifications prohibited by Regulation B.

 

B.        Verification of Information

 

The final rule provides that, in general, a creditor must verify the information relied upon in determining a consumer’s ATR using reasonably reliable third-party records.  Such third-party verifications must be unique to the borrower.  For example: 

 

·         In addition to a W-2 or payroll statement, you may verify income using tax returns, bank statements, receipts from check-cashing or funds-transfer services, benefits program documentation, or records from an employer.  Copies of tax-return transcripts or payroll statements can be obtained directly from the consumer or from a service provider, and need not be obtained directly from a government agency or employer, as long as the records are reasonably reliable and specific to the individual consumer.

·         If a consumer has more income than, in your reasonable and good-faith judgment, is needed to repay the loan, you do not have to verify the extra income.  For example, if a consumer has both a full-time and a part-time job and you reasonably determine that income from the full-time job is enough for the consumer to be able to repay the loan, you do not have to verify income from the part-time job.

·         You can document a consumer’s employment status by calling the employer and getting oral verification, as long as you maintain a record of the information you received on the call.

·         You can use a credit report to verify a consumer’s debt obligations; you do not need to obtain individual statements for every debt. 

·         If a consumer does not have a credit history from a credit bureau, you can choose to verify credit history using documents that show nontraditional credit references, such as rental payment history or utility payments.

 

1.         Reasonably Reliable Third-Party Records

 

The final rule provides a list of some of the types of reasonably reliable third-party records that a bank may choose to use and rely upon.  Note, however, that this list is not all-inclusive: 

 

·         records from government organizations such as a tax authority or local government

·         federal, state, or local government agency letters detailing the consumer’s income, benefits, or entitlements

·         statements provided by a cooperative, condominium, or homeowners association

·         a ground rent or lease agreement

·         credit reports

·         statements for student loans, auto loans, credit cards, or existing mortgages

·         court orders for alimony or child support

·         copies of the consumer’s federal or state tax returns

·         W-2 forms or other IRS forms for reporting wages or tax withholding

·         payroll statements

·         military leave and earnings statements

·         financial institution records, such as bank account statements or investment account statements reflecting the value of particular assets

·         records from the consumer’s employer or a third party that obtained consumer specific income information from the employer

·        check-cashing receipts

 

A creditor may also obtain records directly from the consumer, such as a payroll statement, if the records are reasonably reliable and specific to the consumer.  The verification requirement only applies to information the lender relies upon to qualify the borrower.

 

C.        Payment Calculation

 

To assess the monthly payment on the covered loan, the creditor must determine a payment amount based on the higher of the fully-indexed rate or introductory rate, and on monthly, fully amortizing payments that are substantially equal.

 

The final rule provides that for purposes of determining a consumer’s ATR a loan, a creditor must include consideration of any simultaneous loan that it knows or has reason to know will be made at or before consummation of the covered transaction.

D.        DTI or Residual Income Calculation

 

Creditors are required to consider the DTI ratio or residual income the consumer will have after paying non-mortgage debt and mortgage-related obligations, as part of the ability-to-repay determination.  A QM loan generally may not have a DTI ratio of more than 43 percent.

 

When calculating DTI, a creditor must consider the consumer’s total monthly debt obligations and total monthly income.  Total monthly debt obligations include payments on the covered transaction, payments on simultaneous loans, mortgage-related obligations, debt obligations, alimony and child support.  Total monthly income includes the consumer’s current or reasonably expected income, including any income from assets.

 

The bank may include earned income (wages, or salary); unearned income (interest and dividends); and other regular payments to the consumer such as alimony, child support or government benefits for purposes of calculating income for purposes of the debt-to-income ratio. 

 

When calculating residual income, a creditor must consider the consumer’s remaining income after subtracting the consumer’s total monthly debt obligations from the consumer’s total monthly income.

 

1.         Income-Assets-Employment-And Credit History

 

When you are evaluating the consumer’s employment history, credit history, and income or assets to determine ATR, you must verify only what is relied on to determine ATR.

 

If a consumer has a full-time job and a part-time job and uses only the income from the full-time job to pay the loan, you do not need to verify the income from the part-time job.  If two or more consumers apply for a mortgage, you do not have to consider both incomes – unless both incomes are required to qualify for the loan and demonstrate ATR.  The same principles apply to a consumer’s assets, too.

 

Income does not have to be full-time or salaried for it to be consider it in the ATR determination.  A creditor can consider seasonal or bonus income, however, income relied on has to be verified using reasonably reliable third-party records.

 

Future income can count toward ATR if you verify it using reasonably reliable third-party records.  Suppose you have a consumer who accepts a job in March, but will not start until he graduates from school in May.  If the employer will confirm the job offer and salary in writing, you can consider the future expected income in your ATR determination.

 

2.         Consumer-Supplied Income Documents

 

Sometimes you may have to rely on the consumers’ report of their own income.  For example, a cattle rancher might give you an updated profit-and-loss statement for the current year to supplement his tax returns from prior years.  These records are reasonably reliable third-party records to the extent that an appropriate third party has reviewed them.  For example, if a third-party accountant prepared or reviewed the cattle rancher’s profit-and-loss statement, then you can use the statement to verify the rancher’s current income.

 

3.         Types of Employment Information

 

You can consider and verify many types of employment to use in making your ATR determination, including:

 

·         Full-time

·         Part-time

·         Seasonal

·         Irregular

·         Military

·         Self-employment

 

Consider the characteristics of the consumer’s type of employment.  A wheat farmer has a different income stream than a store clerk.

 

You can verify the consumer’s employment by calling the employer and obtaining oral verification, so long as you make a written record memorializing the verification.

 

4.         Sources of Credit History Information

 

A credit report generally is considered a reasonably reliable third-party record for verification purposes.

 

While the rule requires that you examine credit history, it does not prescribe a particular type of credit history to consider or prescribe specifically how you should judge the information you receive.  Your consideration of credit history must be reasonable in light of the facts and circumstances.

 

Credit history might include information about:

 

·         Number and age of credit lines

·         Payment history

·         Judgments

·         Collections 

·         Bankruptcies

·         Nontraditional credit references such as rental payment history or utility payments

 

If you know, or have a reason to know, that the information on a consumer’s credit report is inaccurate, you can ignore it.  For example, there might be a fraud alert or a dispute on the credit report, or the consumer may present other evidence that contradicts the credit report. In those cases, you may choose to disregard the inaccurate or disputed items.

 

If the consumer lists a debt obligation that does not show up on the credit report, you may accept the consumer’s statement about the existence and amount of the obligation without further verification.

 

V.        Debt Considered in Determining ATR

 

In assessing a consumers ATR, four underwriting factors help to evaluate the consumer’s debt.  A bank will need to determine the consumer’s total monthly payments for:  (1) the loan being underwritten; (2) any simultaneous loans secured by the same property; (3) mortgage-related obligations – property taxes, insurance required by the creditor, fees owed to the condominium, cooperative, or homeowners association; ground rent or leasehold payments; and special assessments; and (4) current debt obligations, alimony and child support. 

 

A.        Confirming Debt Information

 

1.         Calculating Payments on the Loan Being Underwritten

 

There are special rules that apply for meeting the ATR requirements.  When calculating the monthly payment for qualification purposes, the creditor must use the fully indexed interest rate or the introductory interest rate whichever is higher.  The creditor must then calculate monthly, fully amortizing payments that are substantially equal.  This is not meant to prescribe required loan features that a creditor may offer; rather the final rule establishes requirements for the purposes of calculating a payment amount that will be used solely for qualification purposes.

 

B.        Special Rules

 

There are special rules for balloon payment, interest-only, and negative amortization loans.

 

1.         Balloon Payment Loans

 

·         For balloon loans that are not higher-priced covered transactions, use the maximum payment scheduled during the first five years after the date on which the first regular periodic payment will be due.  

·         For balloon loans that are higher-priced covered transactions, use the maximum payment in the payment schedule, including any balloon payment. 

·         For purposes of the ATR requirements, a “higher-priced covered transaction” is one in which the annual percentage rate exceeds the average prime offer rate for a comparable transaction by 1.5 or more percentage points for a first-line covered transaction, or by 3.5 or more percentage points for a subordinate-lien covered transaction. 

 

2.         Interest-Only Loans

 

·         Use the fully indexed rate or the introductory rate, whichever is greater, and

·         Substantially equal, monthly payments of principal and interest that will repay the loan amount over the term of the loan remaining as of the date the loan is recast.

 

3.         Negative Amortization Loans

 

·         Use the fully indexed rate or any introductory rate, whichever is greater, and

·         Substantially equal, monthly payments of principal and interest that will repay the maximum loan amount over the term of the loan remaining as of the date the loan is recast.

 

C.        Calculating Payments For Simultaneous Loan Secured by the Same Property

 

If you know, or have reason to know, that there is going to be a simultaneous transaction around the time your transaction consummates, you need to consider the monthly payment on that transaction in accordance with the following requirements.

 

·         For simultaneous transactions that are not HELOCs - the ATR assessment should include a monthly payment on the simultaneous loan that is calculated using the appropriate calculation method for adjustable-rate mortgages, interest-only loans, or other categories discussed above, depending on what type of simultaneous loan is made.

·         For simultaneous transactions that are HELOCs - the ATR assessment should include a monthly payment on the simultaneous loan that is calculated based on the amount of credit to be drawn down at or before consummation of the main loan.

 

D.        Mortgage Related Obligations

 

You can get records for the consumer’s mortgage-related obligations from many sources including: 
 

·         property taxes:  government entities or the amount listed on the title report (if the source of the information was a local taxing authority);

·         cooperative, condominium, or homeowners associations:  a billing statement from the association;

·         levies and assessments:  statement from the assessing entity (for example, a water district bill);

·         ground rent:  the current ground rent agreement;

·         lease payments:  the existing lease agreement; and

·         other records:  can be reasonably reliable if they come from a third party.

 

E.        Other Recurring Debts

 

The rule requires you to consider a consumer’s current debt obligations and any alimony or child support the consumer is required to pay.

 

Typical recurrent monthly debts include:

 

·         Student loans;

·         Auto loans;

·         Revolving debt; and

·         Existing mortgages not being paid off at or before consummation.

 

You can generally verify such obligations based on the consumer’s credit report or based on other items reported on the consumer’s application.  Creditors have significant flexibility to consider current debt obligations in light of facts and circumstances, including that an obligation is likely to be paid off soon after consummation.  Similarly, creditors should consider whether debt obligations in forbearance or deferral at the time of underwriting are likely to affect the consumer’s ATR after the expiration of the forbearance or deferral period.

 

VI.       QUALIFIED MORTGAGES

 

A.        Types of QMs

 

There are four types of QMs under the final rule.  Two types, the General and Temporary QMs can be originated by all creditors.  The other two types, small creditor and balloon-payment QMs, can only be originated by “small creditors.” 

 

Some requirements are common across all four types of QM.  These requirements include:

 

·         a prohibition on negative amortization or interest-only payments;

·         a prohibition on loan terms in excess of 30 years; and

·         limitations on points and fees:  the threshold is generally 3 percent of the loan balance, but larger amounts are allowed for loans under $100,000.

The type of presumption of compliance for a QM depends on whether it is higher-priced.  QMs under the General and Temporary definitions are considered higher-priced if they have an APR that exceeds the APOR by 1.5 percentage points or more for first-lien loans and 3.5 percentage points or more for subordinate-lien loans.  Small Creditor and Balloon-Payment QMs are considered higher-priced if they have an APR that exceeds the APOR by 3.5 percentage points or more for both first-lien and subordinate-lien loans. 
If a loan that is not higher-priced satisfies the QM criteria, a court will conclusively presume that you complied with the ATR rule.
 
 
If a higher-priced loan meets the QM criteria, a court will presume it complies with the ATR requirements, but the consumer may rebut the presumption.
 
B.        Safe Harbor and Rebuttable Presumption –Liability Protection
 
QMs can receive two different levels of protection from liability. Which level they receive depends on whether the loan is higher-priced or not.

 

1.         Safe Harbor
QMs that are not higher-priced have a safe harbor, meaning that they are conclusively presumed to comply with the ATR requirements.
Under a safe harbor, if a court finds that a mortgage you originated was a QM, then that finding conclusively establishes that you complied with the ATR requirements when you originated the mortgage.

 

For example, a consumer could claim that in originating the mortgage you did not make a reasonable and good-faith determination of repayment ability and that you therefore violated the ATR rule.  If a court finds that the loan met the QM requirements and was not higher-priced, the consumer would lose this claim.
The consumer could attempt to show that the loan is not a QM (for example, under the General QM definition that the DTI ratio was miscalculated and exceeds 43 percent), and therefore is not presumed to comply with the ATR requirements.  However, if the loan is indeed a QM and is not higher-priced, the consumer has no recourse under this regulation.

 

2.         Rebuttable Presumption
QMs that are higher-priced have a rebuttable presumption that they comply with the ATR requirements, but consumers can rebut that presumption.

 
Under a rebuttable presumption, if a court finds that a mortgage you originated was a higher-priced QM, a consumer can argue that you violated the ATR rule.  

However, to prevail on that argument, the consumer must show that based on the information available to you at the time the mortgage was made, the consumer did not have enough residual income left to meet living expenses after paying their mortgage and other debts. 

The rebuttable presumption provides more legal protection and certainty to you than the general ATR requirements, but less protection and certainty than the safe harbor.

 

C.        General QM

The general QM final rule replaces the existing 43% debt–to–income ratio limit and the general QM definition with price–based thresholds and makes other changes to the ATR/QM rule as discussed below.  

1.         Amended General QM Definition

The General QM Final Rule amends the General QM definition. Among other things, it replaces the existing 43 percent DTI limit with a price-based limit and removes Appendix Q as well as any requirements to use Appendix Q for General QM loans. However, the General QM Final Rule retains the ATR/QM Rule’s consider and verify requirements and clarifies how they apply under the revised General QM definition. The General QM Final Rule also retains the existing product-feature and underwriting requirements and limits on points and fees.

2.         Price-Based Limit

 

A loan meets the revised General QM definition only if the annual percentage rate (APR) exceeds the average prime offer rate (APOR) for a comparable transaction by less than the applicable threshold set forth in the General QM Final Rule as of the date the interest rate is set. Generally, this threshold is 2.25 percentage points. However, the General QM Final Rule provides higher thresholds for loans with smaller loan amounts, for certain manufactured housing loans, and for subordinate-lien transactions. The thresholds (which will be adjusted annually for inflation) set forth in the General QM Final Rule are:

•               For a first-lien covered transaction with a loan amount greater than or equal to $110,260, 2.25 percentage points;

•               For a first-lien covered transaction with a loan amount greater than or equal to $66,156 but less than $110,260, 3.5 percentage points;

•               For a first-lien covered transaction with a loan amount less than $66,156, 6.5 percentage points;

•               For a covered transaction secured by a manufactured home with a loan amount less than $110,260, 6.5 percentage points;

•               For a covered transaction secured by a manufactured home with a loan amount equal to or greater than $110,260, 2.25 percentage points;

•               For a subordinate-lien covered transaction with a loan amount greater than or equal to $66,156, 3.5 percentage points; and

•               For a subordinate-lien covered transaction with a loan amount less than $66,156, 6.5 percentage points.

 

(Manufactured home means any residential structure as defined under regulations of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development establishing manufactured home construction and safety standards. Modular or other factory-built homes that do not meet the HUD code standards are not manufactured homes for these purposes.)

 

If a loan’s interest rate may or will change in the first five years after the date on which the first regular periodic payment will be due, the creditor must treat the highest interest rate that may apply during that five years as the loan’s interest rate for the entire loan term when determining the APR for purposes of these thresholds.

3.         Consider and Verify Requirements

The revised General QM definition retains “consider and verify” requirements. First, it requires that creditors consider the consumer’s current or reasonably expected income or assets (other than the value of the dwelling that secures the loan and any real property attached to that dwelling), debt obligations, alimony, child support, and DTI ratio or residual income. Second, it requires that creditors verify the consumer’s current or reasonably expected income or assets (other than the value of the dwelling that secures the loan and any real property attached to that dwelling) as well as the consumer’s debt obligations, alimony, and child support. A creditor must verify such amounts using reasonably reliable third-party records and reasonable methods and criteria. A creditor may only consider amounts that it has verified in accordance with the verification requirements.

However, the General QM Final Rule does not prescribe specifically how a creditor must consider the monthly DTI ratio or residual income, a particular monthly DTI ratio or residual income threshold, or specific methods of underwriting that a creditor must use (other than to require that verification methods and criteria must be reasonable). Furthermore, the General QM Final Rule provides flexibility for a creditor to take into account additional factors that are relevant in determining a consumer’s ability to repay the loan. 

To prevent uncertainty that may result from Appendix Q’s removal, the General QM Final Rule clarifies the consider and verify requirements in the revised General QM definition. For example, the General QM Final Rule clarifies that to meet the requirement to consider, a creditor must:

•        Take into account current or reasonably expected income or assets (other than the value of the dwelling that secures the loan and any real property attached to that dwelling), debt obligations, alimony, child support, and monthly DTI ratio or residual income in its ability-to-repay determination;

•        Maintain written policies and procedures for how it takes into account income or assets, debt obligations, alimony, child support, and monthly DTI ratio or residual income in its ability-to-repay determination; and

•        Retain documentation showing how it took into account income or assets, debt obligations, alimony, child support, and monthly DTI ratio or residual income in its ability-to-repay determination, including how it applied its policies and procedures. Examples of such documentation may include an underwriter worksheet or a final automated underwriting system certification, in combination with the creditor’s applicable underwriting standards and any applicable exceptions described in its policies and procedures, that shows how these required factors were taken into account in the creditor’s ability-to-repay determination. If a creditor does not satisfy this documentation requirement for a loan, that loan is not a General QM under the revised definition.

Additionally, the General QM Final Rule includes a list of specific verification standards that creditors may use to meet the revised General QM definition’s verify requirement. If a creditor satisfies the verification standards in one or more specified manuals, the creditor has a safe harbor for compliance with the verification requirement in the revised General QM definition. These standards include relevant provisions in specified versions of the Fannie Mae Single Family Selling Guide, the Freddie Mac Single-Family Seller/Servicer Guide, the FHA’s Single Family Housing Policy Handbook, the VA’s Lenders Handbook, and the USDA’s Field Office Handbook for the Direct Single Family Housing Program and Handbook for the Single Family Guaranteed Loan Program. The General QM Final Rule sets forth the specific provisions and versions of these manuals that creditors must use to obtain a safe harbor, and notes a creditor also obtains a safe harbor if it complies with revised versions of the manuals listed in the General QM Final Rule, provided that the two versions are substantially similar. It clarifies that a creditor need only comply with requirements in the manuals for creditors to verify income, assets, debt obligations, alimony and child support using specified reasonably reliable third-party documents or to include or exclude particular inflows, property, and obligations as income, assets, debt obligations, alimony, and child support.

4.         Other Provisions

 

The General QM Final Rule also clarifies that a creditor does not meet the verification requirements in the ATR/QM Rule’s general ability-to-repay standard if the creditor observes an inflow of funds into the consumer’s account without confirming that the funds are the consumer’s personal income. For example, a creditor would not meet the verification requirements in the ATR/QM Rule’s general ability-to-repay standard where it observes an unidentified deposit in the consumer’s account but fails to take any measures to confirm or lacks any basis to conclude that the deposit represents the consumer’s personal income and is not from another source, such as proceeds from a loan.

The General QM Final Rule preserves the ATR/QM Rule’s current threshold separating safe harbor from rebuttable presumption QMs. Under that threshold, a loan is a safe harbor QM if its APR exceeds APOR for a comparable transaction by less than 1.5 percentage points as of the date the interest rate is set or by less than 3.5 percentage points for subordinate-lien transactions. However, the General QM Final Rule creates a special rule for General QM loans for which the interest rate may or will change within the first five years after the date on which the first regular periodic payment will be due. For such loans, the creditor must determine the APR, for purposes of this threshold, by treating the maximum interest rate that may apply during that five-year period as the interest rate for the full term of the loan.

5.         Effective Date of the General QM Final Rule

The general QM final rule was originally effective on March 1, 2021, but had a mandatory compliance date of July 1, 2021.  

NOTE: The CFPB further delayed the mandatory compliance date of the General QM Final Rule from July 1, 2021 to October 1, 2022. The old, DTI-based General QM definition; the new, priced-based General QM definition; and the GSE Patch (unless the GSE’s exit conservatorship prior to October 1, 2022) would all remain available as long as the lender received the consumer’s application prior to October 1, 2022. 

D.        Temporary QM

In its final rule, the CFPB noted that consumers can often afford a loan with a DTI ratio above 43 percent based on their particular circumstances and that such loans are better evaluated on an individual basis under the general ATR criteria rather than with a blanket presumption as set forth under the rule’s QM provisions. The final rule provides for a second, temporary category of QMs that have more flexible underwriting requirements.

Under this category, a loan where the borrower has a DTI ratio over 43 percent can still be a QM if: the loan meets each of the QM product feature criteria mentioned earlier — such as the limitations on points and fees and loan term; and the loan is eligible for purchase or guarantee by government sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac (or any successor while under conservatorship), or insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), Veterans Administration (VA), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) or Rural Housing Service (RHS). The loan does not actually have to be sold to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or insured by FHA.

However, the loan must be eligible for purchase or guarantee by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (or any limited-life regulatory entity succeeding the charter of either), including satisfying any requirements regarding consideration and verification of a consumer’s income or assets, credit history, debt-to-income ratio or residual income, and other credit risk factors, but not any requirements regarding matters wholly unrelated to ability to repay.  To determine eligibility for purchase, guarantee or insurance, a creditor may rely on a valid underwriting recommendation provided by a GSE automated underwriting system (AUS) or an AUS that relies on an agency underwriting tool; compliance with the standards in the GSE or Agency written guide in effect at the time; a written agreement between the creditor or a direct sponsor or aggregator of the creditor and a GSE or Agency that permits variation from the standards of the written guides and/or variation from the AUSs, in effect at the time of consummation; or an individual loan waiver granted by the GSE or Agency to the creditor.  In using any of the four methods listed above, the creditor need not satisfy standards that are wholly unrelated to assessing a consumer’s ability to repay that the creditor is required to perform.  Matters wholly unrelated to ability to repay are those matters that are wholly unrelated to credit risk or the underwriting of the loan.  Such matters include requirements related to the status of the creditor rather than the loan, requirements related to selling, securitizing, or delivering the loan, and any requirement that the creditor must perform after the consummated loan is sold, guaranteed, or endorsed for insurance such as document custody, quality control, or servicing.

The temporary category of QMs terminates in January 2021 at the latest.  This QM category as it applies to Fannie, Freddie or any limited-life successor, will sunset when such entity is no longer under conservatorship or receivership.

E.    Small Creditor QM

The final rule amendments provide flexibility intended to preserve borrowers’ access to credit from small creditors.  Small creditors are defined in the final amendments as creditors with no more than $2 billion in assets (including the assets of the creditor’s mortgage originating affiliates, effective January 1, 2016) that, along with affiliates, originate no more than 2,000 first-lien mortgages covered under the ATR rules per year, and which have made at least one covered loan in a “rural” or “underserved” area.  Effective January 1, 2016, loans held in portfolio by the creditor and its affiliates are excluded from the loan origination limit for small-creditor status.

 

Small creditor QMs generally lose their QM status if sold or otherwise transferred less than three years after consummation.  The final rule amendments adopt a proposed QM category for certain loans originated and held in portfolio for at least three years — subject to certain limited exceptions — by small creditors.  The loans must meet the general restrictions on QMs with regard to loan features and points and fees, and creditors must evaluate consumers’ DTI ratio or residual income.  However, the loans are not subject to a specific DTI ratio as they would be under the general QM definition.

 

The QM small creditor portfolio category includes only loans held in portfolio by small creditors.  Therefore, if a creditor agreed prior to consummation to sell a loan, that loan would not be a QM under the proposed definition.  The rule also provides an exception that allows forward commitments to sell to a creditor that also meets the limits on asset size and number of first-lien covered transactions.

As required under the ATR final rule, when underwriting the loan, the creditor is required to consider and verify the consumer’s income and assets and base the underwriting on a monthly payment calculated using the maximum interest rate that may apply during the first five years of the loan and that is fully amortizing.

The CFPB’s final rule amendments also permit small creditors to charge a higher annual percentage rate for first-lien QMs in the QM small creditor portfolio category and still benefit from the conclusive presumption of compliance set forth under the safe harbor.

The CFPB’s final rule amendments grant safe harbor status to small creditor portfolio QMs if the annual percentage rate is equal to or less than the average prime offer rate plus 3.5 percentage points for both first-lien and subordinate-lien loans.

F.        Seasoned QM

The Seasoned QM Final Rule creates a new category of QMs, the Seasoned QM. A residential mortgage loan is a Seasoned QM and receives a safe harbor from liability under the ATR/QM Rule if the loan satisfies certain product restrictions, does not exceed a points-and-fees limit, satisfies underwriting requirements, is held in portfolio until the end of the seasoning period (subject to certain enumerated exceptions), and meets certain performance standards at the end of the seasoning period. A loan made by any creditor, regardless of size, is eligible to become a Seasoned QM if at the end of the seasoning period it meets the requirements in the Seasoned QM Final Rule. Loans that satisfy another QM definition at consummation also can be Seasoned QM loans, as long as the requirements for Seasoned QMs are met.

 

1.         Product Restrictions and Points-and-Fees Limit

A loan has to meet the following product restrictions to be eligible to become a Seasoned QM:

 ·         The loan is secured by a first lien. If a loan is a subordinate-lien loan, the loan is not eligible to be a Seasoned QM.

·         The loan has a fixed rate. Adjustable-rate or step-rate mortgage loans are not eligible to be Seasoned QMs 

·         The loan has regular, substantially equal periodic payments that are fully amortizing, does not allow negative amortization, and does not have a balloon payment. A loan has fully amortizing payments if periodic payments of principal and interest will fully repay the loan over the loan term.

·         The loan term does not exceed 30 years

·         The loan is not a high-cost mortgage as defined in Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.32(a).

 Additionally, the total points and fees for the loan cannot exceed the limits specified in the ATR/QM Rule. Generally, this means that the total points and fees cannot exceed 3 percent of the loan amount.

These product restrictions do not prohibit a qualifying change that is entered into during or after a temporary payment accommodation in connection with a disaster or pandemic-related national emergency, even if the qualifying change involves, for example, a balloon payment or lengthened loan term. The Seasoned QM Final Rule sets forth conditions that must be met for a change to be a qualifying change.

2.         Underwriting Requirements

For a loan to be eligible to become a Seasoned QM, the creditor must meet consider and verify requirements for the loan. The creditor must consider the consumer’s DTI ratio or residual income, income and assets other than the value of the dwelling, and debts and must verify the consumer’s income or assets other than the value of the dwelling and the consumer’s debts, using the consider and verify requirements established for General QMs in the General QM Final Rule.  

As noted in the above discussion of the General QM Final Rule, to comply with these consider requirements, a creditor is required to take into account the consumer’s income, assets, debt obligations, alimony, child support, and monthly DTI ratio or residual income in its ability-to-repay determination. Although the requirements do not prescribe how a creditor must take these factors into account or impose a particular standard or threshold for considering DTI ratio or residual income, a creditor must maintain written policies and procedures for how it takes into account the factors and retain documentation showing how it took into account the factors for a given loan.

Creditors are also required to satisfy verification requirements. They must verify the consumer’s income or assets other than the value of the dwelling and the consumer’s debts using reasonably reliable third-party records in a manner consistent with the revised standards for General QMs. As discussed above, creditors will receive a safe harbor for compliance with the verification requirements if they comply with verification standards in the relevant provisions of the manuals specified in the General QM Final Rule or with certain revised versions of those manuals.

3.         Portfolio Requirements

In order to be eligible to be a Seasoned QM, a loan must meet certain portfolio requirements. Generally, a loan is eligible to be a Seasoned QM only if, at consummation, the loan is not subject to a commitment to be acquired by another person, and the creditor holds the loan in portfolio until the end of the seasoning period. However, the Seasoned QM Final Rule provides exceptions to these portfolio requirements.      

First, the Seasoned QM Final Rule provides some exceptions that are similar to those that apply to Small Creditor QMs under the ATR/QM Rule. For example, it allows transfers pursuant to certain supervisory sales and pursuant to certain mergers and acquisitions.

Second, the Seasoned QM Final Rule allows for a single transfer during the seasoning period if the loan is not securitized as part of the transfer or at any other time before the end of the seasoning period. This exception may only be used one time. This means that if a loan is to remain eligible to become a Seasoned QM, a purchaser that acquires the loan pursuant to this exception may not subsequently transfer it to any other entity, unless a different exception applies. Additionally, the loan may not be securitized before the end of the seasoning period.

4.         Performance Requirements

 In order to become a Seasoned QM, a loan must meet certain performance requirements at the end of the seasoning period. Specifically, the loan can have no more than two delinquencies of 30 or more days and no delinquencies of 60 or more days at the end of the seasoning period.

The Seasoned QM Final Rule defines delinquency as the failure to make a periodic payment (in one full payment or in two or more partial payments) sufficient to cover principal, interest, and escrow (if applicable) for a given billing cycle by the date the periodic payment is due under the terms of the legal obligation. The failure to pay other amounts, such as late fees, does not constitute a delinquency for purposes of the performance requirements. Additionally, if there is a qualifying change during or after a temporary payment accommodation in connection with a disaster or pandemic-related national emergency, the principal and interest used to determine whether a periodic payment is delinquent are the principal and interest amounts as modified by the qualifying change.

When determining whether a scheduled periodic payment is delinquent for this purpose, the due date is the date the payment is due under the terms of the legal obligation, without regard to whether the consumer is afforded a period after the due date to pay before the servicer assesses a late fee. However, if the first payment due date in the legal obligation at consummation is modified due to reasons related to the timing of delivery, set up, or availability for occupancy of the dwelling securing the loan, the modified first payment due date shall be considered when determining if the periodic payment is delinquent.

A periodic payment is 30 days delinquent when it is not paid before the due date of the following scheduled periodic payment. A periodic payment is 60 days delinquent if the consumer is more than 30 days delinquent on the first of two sequential periodic payments and does not make both sequential payments before the due date of the next scheduled periodic payment after the two sequential periodic payments. Thus, a monthly, bi-weekly, or quarterly periodic payment would be 30 days delinquent when the periodic payment is not paid by the due date of the following monthly, bi-weekly, or quarterly payment due date. The Seasoned QM Final Rule also provides an example of how to determine if a periodic payment is 60 days delinquent.

Funds taken from escrow and funds paid on behalf of the consumer by the creditor, servicer, or assignee of the loan (or any other person acting on their behalf) are not considered in assessing whether a periodic payment has been made or is delinquent for purposes of the Seasoned QM Final Rule’s performance requirements. Creditors can, however, generally accept deficient payments, within a payment tolerance of $50, on up to three occasions during the seasoning period without triggering a delinquency for purposes of these performance requirements. This exception to the definition of delinquency in the Seasoned QM Final Rule only applies, however, if the creditor does not treat the payment as delinquent for purposes of the mortgage servicing provisions in subpart C of Regulation X.

5.         Seasoning Period

In order for a loan to be a Seasoned QM, it must meet certain requirements during or at the end of a seasoning period. Generally, the seasoning period is the 36-month period that begins on the date on which the first periodic payment is due after consummation. The end of the seasoning period occurs later in two situations.

First, if there is a delinquency of 30 days or more at the end of the final month of the seasoning period, the seasoning period is extended until there is no delinquency.

Second, time spent in a temporary payment accommodation extended in connection with a disaster or pandemic-related national emergency does not count towards the seasoning period. Additionally, the seasoning period can only resume after the temporary payment accommodation if any delinquency is cured either pursuant to the loan’s original terms or through a qualifying change.

6.         Safe Harbor

The Seasoned QM Final Rule provides a safe harbor for Seasoned QMs, regardless of whether the loan is a higher-priced loan.

7.         Effective Date

The Seasoned QM Final Rule is effective on March 1, 2021. Its revisions to the ATR/QM Rule apply to covered transactions for which a creditor receives an application on or after the effective date, although because of the 36-month seasoning period, the seasoned QM Final Rule did not have any immediate impact.

G.        Balloon Payment Transition QM

The January ATR/QM rule generally provides that a balloon-payment mortgage cannot be a QM.  However, the rule also implemented a special provision of Dodd-Frank that would treat certain balloon-payment mortgages as QMs if they are originated and held in portfolio by small creditors operating predominantly in rural or underserved areas.  To expand eligibility for the QM balloon-payment exception, the definition of a small creditor in a rural or underserved area has been changed from one that “predominately” makes covered loans in rural or underserved areas to a lender that makes at least one covered loan in those areas.

Under the QM balloon payment exception, creditors are required to determine at or before consummation that the consumer can make all scheduled payments, other than the balloon payment.

Like the small creditor portfolio category, this QM category is only available to creditors:

•         With affiliates, made 2,000 or fewer covered transactions in prior calendar year; and

•         As of December 31 of the preceding year, had assets of less than $2 billion (including the assets of the creditor’s mortgage originating affiliates).

Subject to limited exceptions, the loan in question must be retained for at least three years unless sold to another qualifying creditor.  The loan must conform to the other general QM requirements mentioned earlier, for instance, the ban on negative amortization and the limitation on points and fees.  The loan must provide for substantially equal scheduled payments with a maximum 30-year amortization period.  The interest rate may not increase.  The rule also sets the minimum loan term for balloon-payment QMs at five years.

Consumers may rebut the presumption of QM compliance for first-lien and subordinate lien loans that exceed certain percentage rate thresholds.  The CFPB amendments extend the QM safe harbor to first-lien balloon loans made and held in portfolio by small creditors that have an annual percentage rate between 1.5 and 3.5 percentage points above the APOR.

VII.     Refinance of “Non-Standard Mortgages” to “Standard Mortgages”- Exception to ATR

The regulation allows a borrower to refinance its “nonstandard mortgage” into a “standard mortgage.”  This approach provides an exception to the ATR requirements to allow certain borrowers to refinance with their existing creditor in order to lower the monthly payment and help prevent a default on the nonstandard mortgage.  There are specific requirements for both the “non-standard mortgage” and the “standard mortgage.”

For purposes of this exception, a “nonstandard mortgage” is a loan that has one or more of these features:

·         an adjustable-rate mortgage loan with an introductory fixed rate for a period of one year or longer;

·         a loan with an interest-only feature; or

·         a negative amortization loan.

A “standard mortgage” has the following features:

·         regular periodic payments that do not cause the principal balance to increase, do not allow the consumer to defer payments of principal, or result in a balloon payment;

·         the “points and fees” generally do not exceed the threshold for a QM (see additional detail on the “points and fees” requirements under section VIII, below);

·         the term does not exceed 40 years;

·         the interest rate is fixed for at least the first five years after consummation; and

The proceeds are used solely to pay off the outstanding balance on the non-standard mortgage or to pay closing or settlement charges. Under this exception to the ATR requirements, the following conditions must be met:

·         The creditor originating the standard mortgage is the current holder or servicer of the non-standard mortgage;

·         The monthly payment for the standard mortgage is “materially lower” than the monthly payment for the non-standard mortgage (not defined in final rule, but comments state that it will depend on the facts, but that in all cases, a 10 percent reduction will be deemed “materially lower.”)

·         The application must come in no later than two months after the non-standard mortgage has recast;

·         The consumer has made no more than one payment more than 30 days late on the non-standard mortgage during the 12 months before the application is received;

·         The consumer has made no payments more than 30 days late during the six months before the application is received;

·         If the non-standard mortgage was consummated on or after January 10, 2014, it was required to have been made in accordance with the general ability-to-repay standard or general QM exception; and

·         The creditor must consider whether the standard mortgage likely will prevent a default by the consumer on the non-standard mortgage once the loan is recast. 

VIII.    POINTS AND FEES

A loan cannot be a QM if the points and fees paid by the consumer exceed certain thresholds set forth in the final rule.  The rule provides certain exclusions for “bona fide discount points.”

The rule generally limits points and fees to 3 percent of the total loan amount for loans of $ 137,958 or more. The CFPB’s dollar or percentage limits for lower balance loans (less than $ 137,958) include:

  • $ 4,139 for loans of $ 82,775 to less than $ 137,958;
  • 5 percent of the total loan amount for loans of $ 27,592 to less than $ 82,775;
  • $ 1,380 for loans of $ 17,245 to loans less than $ 27,592; and
  • 8 percent of the total loan amount for loans less than $ 17,245.

 

The dollar amounts are subject to annual adjustment for inflation which will be published by the CFPB.

The rule provides that fees included in the points and fees cap are those that are “known at or before” consummation, not simply those points and fees that are payable at that time.

A.        Points and Fees Exclusions

To calculate points and fees, add together the amounts paid in connection with the transaction for the six categories of charges listed below: 

1.         Finance Charge

In general, include all items included in the finance charge, however, the following types and amounts of charges may be excluded, even if they normally would be included in the finance charge: 

a.                   Interest or the time-price differential

b.                  Mortgage insurance premiums

i.          Federal or state-government sponsored mortgage insurance premiums 

The rule provides a complete exclusion for premiums or charges imposed under any federal or state agency program for guarantee or insurance against the consumer’s default or other credit loss.  The rule also makes clear that private mortgage insurance premiums or charges that are payable after consummation are completely excluded.

ii.         Private mortgage insurance premiums

The rule creates a limited exclusion for private mortgage insurance (PMI) premiums and charges that are payable at or before consummation.  In this instance, the PMI premium or charge payable at or before consummation is excluded up to the amount that equals the amount that would have been paid for an FHA loan, provided that two conditions are satisfied.

These conditions are:

·         The premium or charge is refundable on a pro rata basis; and

·         The refund is automatically issued upon satisfaction of the mortgage.

c.         Bona fide discount points 

Under the rule, a bona fide discount point is 1 percent of the loan amount that reduces the interest rate based on a calculation that is “consistent with established industry practices for determining the amount of reduction in the interest rate” for the amount of discount points paid.  Guidance provided by Fannie and Freddie may be relied upon to determine what constitutes a sufficient reduction in rate in exchange for a discount point.

Once a creditor determines that a discount point is bona fide, it must determine whether and how much of the point may be excluded from points and fees.  Up to 2 bona fide discount points may be excluded if the undiscounted rate does not exceed the average prime offer rate by more than 1 percentage point.  Up to one bona fide discount point may be excluded if the undiscounted rate does not exceed the APOR by more than 2 percentage points.

2.         Loan Originator Compensation

The final rule requires compensation paid directly or indirectly by a consumer or creditor to a loan originator other than an employee of a creditor or of a mortgage broker to be included in the calculation of points and fees.  Compensation that is attributable to the transaction, must be included to the extent that such compensation is known as of the date the interest rate for the transaction is set. 

The final rule amendments exclude from points and fees loan originator compensation paid by a consumer to a mortgage broker when that payment has already been counted toward the points and fees threshold as part of the finance charge.  The final rule also excludes from points and fees compensation paid by a mortgage broker to an employee of the mortgage broker because that compensation is already included in points and fees as loan originator compensation paid by the consumer or the creditor to the mortgage broker.

3.         Real Estate Related Fees

All real estate-related fees described in section 1026.4(c)(7) must be included in the calculation of points and fees unless:  

The charge is reasonable;

•         The creditor receives no direct or indirect compensation in connection with the charge; and

•         The charge is not paid to an affiliate of the creditor.

4.         Premiums for Credit Insurance; Credit Property Insurance; Other Life, Accident, Health or Loss-Of-Income Insurance Where the Creditor is a Beneficiary; or Debt Cancellation or Suspension Coverage Payments

Premiums for these types of insurance that are payable at or before consummation are required to be included in the points and fees calculation even if such premiums are rolled into the loan amount, if permitted by law.  Premiums paid after consummation (e.g., monthly premiums) do not need to be included.

5.         Maximum Prepayment Penalty

If a loan has a prepayment penalty, the maximum repayment penalty that can be charged or collected on the loan must be included in points and fees.  For purposes of the final rule, a “prepayment penalty” is defined as a charge imposed for paying all or part of the principle before the date on which it is due.  However, the rule provides some important exceptions, such as the prepayment penalty does not include a waived, bona fide third-party charge that the creditor imposes if the consumer prepays in full sooner than 36 months after consummation. 

Also excluded from the definition of prepayment penalty is interest charged consistent with the monthly interest accrual amortization method on FHA loans consummated before January 21, 2015.  In addition, prepayment penalties do not include: 

·         Fees imposed for preparing documents when a loan is paid in full if such fees are imposed whether or not the loan is prepaid (e.g., payoff statement, reconveyance document, lien release document); and

·         Guarantee fees.

6.         Prepayment Penalty Paid in a Refinance

Prepayment penalties incurred by the consumer must be included in the calculation of points and fees if the consumer refinances the existing mortgage loan with either (a) the current holder of the existing loan; (b) a servicer acting on behalf of the current holder; or (c) an affiliate of either. 

IX.       POINTS-AND-FEES CURE MECHANISM

A.           Introduction 

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has issued a final rule amending its Ability to Repay/Qualified Mortgage Rule that provides a mechanism for curing points-and-fees overages (points and fees exceeding the 3 percent cap) on qualified mortgage (QM) loans.

The points-and-fees cure mechanism will be available for transactions consummated on or after November 3, 2014.  The CFPB explicitly declined to permit the cure mechanism to apply to loans consummated prior to November 3, 2014, and the cure mechanism will sunset on January 10, 2021.

B.           Points-And-Fees Cure

1.            Mechanism    

To cure a points-and-fees overage on a loan that would otherwise be a QM, the creditor or assignee must do two things:

a.       Make a timely compensation payment:  Within 210 days after consummation — or sooner, as described below — the creditor or assignee must “pay to the consumer” both:  (1)   The dollar amount by which the transaction’s total points and fees exceeds the applicable QM limit …; and (2)   Interest on [that] amount …, calculated using the contract interest rate applicable during the period from consummation until the payment is made and

b.      Maintain and follow Policies and Procedures:  The creditor or assignee must maintain and follow policies and procedures for  

•         post-consummation review of points and fees and

•         making payments to consumers by the time and in the amount required by the cure mechanism. 

However, the policies and procedures need not require either (i) a post-consummation review of all loans originated by the creditor or acquired by the assignee, or (ii) that the creditor or assignee cure all points-and-fees overages.

2.            When Compensation Payments Must be Made

The maximum time that the creditor or assignee will have to make the compensation payment is 210 days after consummation.  However, the creditor or assignee may have less time because, for the cure to be effective, the payment also must be made prior to the occurrence of any of the following events:

·         The institution of any action by the consumer in connection with the loan.  (Note that regulatory action with respect to the loan does not cut off the right to cure.);

·         The receipt by the creditor, assignee, or servicer of written notice from the consumer that the transaction’s total points and fees exceed the applicable QM limit; or

·         The consumer becoming 60 days past due on the legal obligation.  “Past due” in this context means the failure to make a periodic payment (in one full payment or in two or more partial payments) sufficient to cover principal, interest, and, if applicable, escrow under the terms of the legal obligation.  Other amounts, such as any late fees, are not considered for this purpose.  The comments provide the following example of what constitutes “past due;” 

Assume a loan is consummated on October 15, 2015, that the consumer’s periodic payment is due on the 1st of each month, and that the consumer timely made the first periodic payment due on December 1, 2015:

  

•         The consumer is 30 days past due if the consumer fails to make a payment (sufficient to cover the scheduled January 1, 2016 periodic payment of principal, interest, and, if applicable, escrow) on or before February 1, 2016.

•         The consumer is 60 days past due if the consumer then also fails to make a payment (sufficient to cover the scheduled January 1, 2016 periodic payment of principal, interest, and, if applicable, escrow) on or before March 1, 2016.

•         The consumer is not 60 days past due if the consumer makes a payment (sufficient to cover the scheduled January 1, 2016 periodic payment of principal, interest, and, if applicable, escrow) on or before March 1, 2016.                                             

Note, as the example reflects, that a periodic payment is 30 days past due when it is not paid on or before the due date of the following scheduled periodic payment and is 60 days past due when, after already becoming 30 days past due, it is not paid on or before the due date of the next scheduled periodic payment.  In addition, the creditor or assignee may treat a received payment as applying to the oldest outstanding periodic payment.

3.            Method and Effective Date of Payment 

The payment to the consumer always may be made “by check.”  Alternatively, it may be made by any other means agreeable to the consumer.  If payment is made by check, the check must be either delivered or placed in the mail to the consumer within 210 days after consummation.  Presumably, then, a creditor also will comply with the timing requirement if the check is placed in the mail – even if not delivered –before any of the other events listed above.

4.            Credit for Payments to Cure Tolerance Violations   

In some instances, an excess of points and fees paid by the consumer can also give rise to a “tolerance violation” under either Regulation X or, after August 1, 2015, under the TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosures (“TRID”) Rule.  A “tolerance violation” occurs when the amount paid at closing by a consumer exceeds the creditor’s estimate by more than a prescribed tolerance.  Tolerance violations, like the assessment of an excess of points and fees, may be cured, by reimbursing the amount by which the tolerance was exceeded within 30 days after settlement.  Similarly, when the TRID Rule goes into effect on August 1, 2015, if amounts paid by the consumer exceed estimates by more than the thresholds, the creditor must refund the excess to the consumer no later than 60 days after consummation. 

To clarify the relationship between the cure provisions for tolerance violations and the new cure for points and fees, the Final Rule provides that the amount paid to the consumer under the points-and-fees cure mechanism described above “may be offset by the amount paid to the consumer” to cure tolerance violations, to the extent that the amount paid to cure the tolerance violation is applied to fees or charges that fit within the “points and fees” definition.  For example, assume a creditor would have to pay $500 to cure a points-and-fees overage, and $300 to cure a tolerance violation.  Further assume that of the $300 tolerance overage, $150 constituted points and fees.  Once the creditor reimburses the consumer with $300 to cure the tolerance violation, the creditor can cure the points-and-fees overage by paying only an additional $350 since the $150 in points and fees for the tolerance violation is offset against the amount required to be paid for the “points-and-fees” violation.  Note that while a creditor is required to cure a tolerance violation, the creditor is not obligated to cure a point-and-fees overage.  However, if the loan loses its status as a qualified mortgage, the creditor loses the greater protection provided under the ATR/QM rule. 

C.           HUD QM Rule

While the Department of Housing and Urban Development is authorized to adopt the CFPB changes to points-and-fees, it has elected not to do so for the following reasons:  

First, the CFPB’s cure provision requires that the cured loan meet CFPB’s qualified mortgage definition in order to qualify for the cure, but HUD has codified its own definition, which differs.  Second, if HUD permitted a FHA lender to return funds to a borrower or pay down the principal balance for a single family mortgage insured under Title II, the amount returned could result in a violation of the statutorily required borrower minimum cash investment of 3.5 percent or other FHA requirements relating to interested party contributions and the calculation of the maximum insured mortgage value.  In addition, unlike the general market, the points and fees limit for Title II mortgages is a requirement for insurability of the mortgage by FHA.  As an insurer of the mortgage, it is imperative that FHA ensure all eligibility requirements are met prior to insurance endorsement.   

While FHA is not able to adopt the CFPB’s cure provision that allows the cure period to extend beyond insurance endorsement, FHA approved lenders are not without the ability to cure errors that occur in origination before submission for insurance endorsement.  FHA reminds all FHA-approved mortgagees that, consistent with FHA’s existing Notice of Return/Notice of Non-Endorsement (NOR) process, mortgagees may continue to cure errors and resubmit mortgages for insurance endorsement, provided all eligibility criteria are met at the time of insurance endorsement.  FHA believes that the existing ability to cure errors is sufficient and is consistent with the attachment of qualified mortgage status at endorsement.  As such, HUD is not adopting the CFPB’s cure provisions and does not believe any further ability to cure is warranted.

X.        EXEMPTIONS FOR CERTAIN CREDITORS AND LENDING PROGRAMS

The final rule amendments exempt from the ATR/QM rules certain nonprofit and communty-based lenders that work to help low- and moderate-income consumers obtain affordable housing.  Among other conditions, the exemptions generally apply to designated categories of community development lenders and to nonprofits that make no more than 200 loans per year and lend only to low- and moderate-income consumers.   Mortgage loans made by or through a housing finance agency or through certain homeownership stabilization and foreclosure prevention programs are also exempted from the ATR requirements.  

XI.       LIABILITY

The Dodd-Frank Act amended the Truth in Lending Act to add additional penalties for noncompliance with the requirements of the ATR/QM rule.  The penalties include: 

    • Actual damages; 
    • Special statutory damages for violation equal to the sum of all finance charges and fees;
      Statutory damages up to a prescribed threshold ($4,000); and  court cost and attorneys’ fees.

The Dodd-Frank Act also extended the statute of limitations from one year to three years from the date of the violation.  This allows the consumer additional time to bring a lawsuit if the consumer believes that the ATR/QM rule has been violated.  Finally, a consumer may assert a violation as a claim for set-off at foreclosure without time limit on when the claim may be raised.

As a result, if a borrower in a foreclosure action is instituted, six, seven or eight years after closing, the borrower would still be able to assert this claim as a defense in the foreclosure action and essentially use damages if they’re successful to offset the amount that they owe on the loan.

If a borrower has trouble repaying their loan during the first three years, a claim could be brought against your bank and, if the court finds that the bank did not satisfy the (a) underwriting criteria (based solely on information that was available at the time the loan was made), the bank could be liable for three years of finance charges and fees, plus attorney expenses.  After the initial three year period, a borrower could only bring such claim as a set-off to foreclosure proceedings. 

    

XII.     FANNIE MAE/FREDDIE MAC PURCHASE OF QMS 

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has directed government sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to limit their future mortgage acquisitions to loans that meet the requirements for a QM, including those that meet the CFPB’s special or temporary QM definition, and loans that are exempt from the Dodd-Frank Act ATR requirements.      

Beginning January 10, 2014, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will no longer purchase a loan that is subject to the CFPB’s ATR/QM rule if the loan:   
     Is not fully amortizing;

    Has a term of longer than 30 years; and
Includes points and fees in excess of 3 percent of the total loan amount, or such other limits for low balance loans as set forth in the final rule.   Effectively this means Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will not purchase interest-only loans, loans with 40 year terms or those with points and fees exceeding the thresholds established by the ATR/QM rule.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will continue to purchase loans that meet the underwriting and delivery eligibility requirements stated in their respective selling guides.  This includes loans that are processed through their automated underwriting systems and loans with a debt-to-income ratio of greater than 43 percent.  Loans with a debt-to-income ratio of more than 43 percent are not eligible for protection as QMs under the final rule unless they are eligible for purchase by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac under the special or temporary QM definition.               

XIII.   ADDITIONAL REVISIONS PROPOSED

Since adoption of the ATR/QM final rule, the CFPB has issued a proposal to provide additional clarification to facilitate implementation of the final rule.  The proposal would provide clearer rules for determining a consumer’s debt-to-income ratio, amend language pertaining to a consumer’s employment record and income, obtaining business credit reports and other issues relating to self-employed consumers, and the treatment of Social Security and rental income.  The proposal would also confirm that loans meeting eligibility requirements provided in a separate agreement between a creditor and a GSE (Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac) or federal agency can be QMs, not just those that follow the general GSE or agency guidelines.  Finally, the proposal would clarify that the temporary QM provision’s requirement that mortgages be “eligible” for purchase, insurance, or guarantee does not exclude loans that do not satisfy procedural and technical GSE or agency requirements that are not relevant to QM status. 

Compliance Handbook Search

*
  • Volume I
    • Compliance Management
    • Governance
    • Bank Structure
    • Personnel
    • Record Retention
    • Public Disclosure
    • Privacy
    • Security
    • CFPB
  • Volume II
    • Deposit Accounts
    • Public Funds
    • Bank Promotion
    • Nondeposit Products
    • Unclaimed Property
  • Volume III
    • Secured Transactions
    • Real Estate
    • Lending
    • Environmental Issues
    • Miscellaneous

STAY CONNECTED

Contact Us

Nebraska Bankers Association

233 South 13th Street, Suite 700
Lincoln, NE 68508
​402-474-1555
​Digital Millennium Copyright Act Policy
Member Login