I. INTRODUCTION
The federal banking agencies (Agencies) have issued the final Interagency Guidance on Correspondent Concentration Risks (Guidance). The Guidance outlines the Agencies’ expectations for financial institutions to identify, monitor, and manage credit and funding concentrations to other institutions on a stand-alone and organization-wide basis, and to take into account exposures to the correspondents’ affiliates. Institutions also should be aware of their affiliates’ exposures to correspondents as well as the correspondents’ subsidiaries and affiliates. In addition, the Guidance addresses the Agencies’ expectations for financial institutions to perform appropriate due diligence on all credit exposures to, and funding transactions with, other financial institutions.
The Guidance does not supplant or amend applicable regulations such as the Federal Reserve Board’s Limitations on Interbank Liabilities (Regulation F). It clarifies that financial institutions may need to take actions beyond the minimum requirements established in Regulation F to identify, monitor, and manage correspondent concentration risks, especially when rapid changes exist in market conditions or in a correspondent’s financial condition, in order to maintain risk management practices consistent with safe and sound operations.
II. CORRESPONDENT CONCENTRATION RISKS
A financial institution’s relationship with a correspondent may result in credit (asset) and funding (liability) concentrations. On the asset side, a credit concentration represents a significant volume of credit exposure that a financial institution has advanced or committed to a correspondent. On the liability side, a funding concentration exists when an institution depends on one or a few correspondents for a disproportionate share of its total funding.
Credit (asset) risk is the potential that an obligation will not be paid in a timely manner or in full. Credit concentration risk arises whenever an institution advances or commits a significant volume of funds to a correspondent, as the advancing institution’s assets are at risk of loss if the correspondent fails to repay.
Funding (liability) concentration risk arises when an institution depends heavily on the liquidity provided by one particular correspondent or a limited number of correspondents to meet its funding needs. Funding concentration risk can create an immediate threat to an institution’s viability if the advancing correspondent suddenly reduces the institution’s access to liquid funds.
For example, a correspondent might abruptly limit the availability of liquid funding sources as part of a prudent program for limiting credit exposure to one institution or organization or as required by regulation when the financial condition of the institution declines rapidly. The Agencies realize some concentrations arise from the need to meet certain business needs or purposes, such as maintaining large due from balances with a correspondent to facilitate account clearing activities. However, correspondent concentrations represent a lack of diversification that management should consider when formulating strategic plans and internal risk limits.
The Agencies have generally considered credit exposures greater than 25 percent of total capital as concentrations.
Depending on its size and characteristics, a concentration of credit for a financial institution may represent a funding exposure to the correspondent.
While the Agencies have not established a funding concentration threshold, the Agencies have seen instances where funding exposures of 5 percent of an institution’s total liabilities have posed an elevated risk to the recipient, particularly when aggregated with other similarly sized funding concentrations.
These levels of credit and funding exposures are not firm limits, but indicate an institution has concentration risk with a correspondent. Such relationships warrant robust risk management practices, particularly when aggregated with other similarly sized funding concentrations, in addition to meeting the minimum regulatory requirements specified in applicable regulations. Financial institutions should identify, monitor, and manage both asset and liability correspondent concentrations and implement procedures to perform appropriate due diligence on all credit exposures to, and funding transactions with, correspondents as part of their overall risk management policies and procedures.
III. IDENTIFYING CORRESPONDENT CONCENTRATIONS
1. The Guidance clarifies that for risk management purposes, institutions should identify correspondent credit and funding concentrations to assist management in assessing how significant economic events or abrupt deterioration in a correspondent’s risk profile might affect their financial condition.
2. Each financial institution should establish appropriate internal parameters (such as information, ratios, trends or other factors) commensurate with the nature, size, and risk characteristics of their correspondent concentrations. An institution’s internal parameters should:
The Agencies also clarified the types of loan participations to be included when calculating credit exposures. The Agencies did not exclude transactions that may have a nominal effect from either the credit or funding concentration calculations to ensure consistency with Regulation F. Institutions should implement procedures for identifying correspondent concentrations. For prudent risk management purposes, these procedures should encompass the totality of the institutions’ aggregate credit and funding concentrations to each correspondent on a stand-alone basis, as well as taking into account exposures to each correspondent organization as a whole. In addition, the institution should be aware of exposures of its affiliates to the correspondent and its affiliates.
IV. CREDIT CONCENTRATIONS
Credit concentrations can arise from a variety of assets and activities. For example, an institution could have due from bank accounts, Federal funds sold on a principal basis, and direct or indirect loans to or investments in a correspondent. In identifying credit concentrations for risk management purposes, institutions should aggregate all exposures, including, but not limited to:
V. FUNDING CONCENTRATIONS
Depending on its size and characteristics, a concentration of credit for a financial institution may be a funding exposure for the correspondent. The primary risk of a funding concentration is that an institution will have to replace those advances on short notice. This risk may be more pronounced if the funds are credit sensitive, or if the financial condition of the party advancing the funds has deteriorated.
The percentage of liabilities or other measurements that may constitute a concentration of funding is likely to vary depending on the type and maturity of the funding, and the structure of the recipient’s sources of funds. For example, a concentration in overnight unsecured funding from one source might raise different concentration issues and concerns than unsecured term funding, assuming compliance with covenants and diversification with short and long-term maturities. Similarly, concerns arising from concentrations in long-term unsecured funding typically increase as these instruments near maturity.
VI. CALCULATING CREDIT AND FUNDING CONCENTRATIONS
When identifying credit and funding concentrations for risk management purposes, institutions should calculate both gross and net exposures to the correspondent on a stand-alone basis and on a correspondent organization-wide basis as part of their prudent risk management practices. Exposures are reduced to net positions to the extent that the transactions are secured by the net realizable proceeds from readily marketable collateral or are covered by valid and enforceable netting agreements. Appendix A, Calculating Correspondent Exposures, contains examples, which are provided for illustrative purposes only.
VII. MONITORING CORRESPONDENT RELATIONSHIPS
Prudent management of correspondent concentration risks includes establishing and maintaining written policies and procedures to prevent excessive exposure to any correspondent in relation to the correspondent’s financial condition. For risk management purposes, institutions’ procedures and frequency for monitoring correspondent relationships may be more or less aggressive depending on the nature, size, and risk of the exposure.
In monitoring correspondent relationships for risk-management purposes, institutions should specify internal parameters relative to what information, ratios, or trends will be reviewed for each correspondent on an ongoing basis. In addition to a correspondent’s capital, level of problem loans, and earnings, institutions may want to monitor other factors, which could include, but are not limited to:
For prudent risk management purposes, institutions should implement procedures that ensure ongoing, timely reviews of correspondent relationships. Institutions should use these reviews to conduct comprehensive assessments that consider their internal parameters and are commensurate with the nature, size, and risk of their exposure. Institutions should increase the frequency of their internal reviews when appropriate, as even well capitalized institutions can experience rapid deterioration in their financial condition, especially in economic downturns. Institutions’ procedures also should establish documentation requirements for the reviews conducted. In addition, the procedures should specify when relationships that meet or exceed internal criteria are to be brought to the attention of the board of directors or the appropriate management committee.
VIII. MANAGING CORRESPONDENT CONCENTRATIONS
Institutions should establish prudent internal concentration limits, as well as ranges or tolerances for each factor being monitored for each correspondent. Institutions should develop plans for managing risk when these internal limits, ranges or tolerances are met or exceeded, either on an individual or collective basis. Contingency plans should provide a variety of actions that can be considered relative to changes in the correspondent’s financial condition. However, contingency plans should not rely on temporary deposit insurance programs for mitigating concentration risk. Prudent risk management of correspondent concentration risks should include procedures that provide for orderly reductions of correspondent concentrations that exceed internal parameters over a reasonable timeframe that is commensurate with the size, type, and volatility of the risk in the exposure. Such actions could include, but are not limited to:
Examiners will review correspondent relationships during examinations to ascertain whether an institution’s policies and procedures appropriately identify and monitor correspondent concentrations. Examiners also will review the adequacy and reasonableness of institutions’ contingency plans to manage correspondent concentrations.
IX. PERFORMING APPROPRIATE DUE DILIGENCE
Financial institutions that maintain credit exposures in, or provide funding to, other financial institutions should have effective risk management programs for these activities. For this purpose, credit or funding exposures may include, but are not limited to, due from bank accounts, Federal funds sold as principal, direct or indirect loans (including participations and syndications), and trust preferred securities, subordinated debt, and stock purchases of the correspondent.
An institution that maintains or contemplates entering into any credit or funding transactions with another financial institution should have written investment, lending, and funding policies and procedures, including appropriate limits, that govern these activities. In addition, these procedures should ensure the institution conducts an independent analysis of credit transactions prior to committing to engage in the transactions. The terms for all such credit and funding transactions should strictly be on an arm’s length basis, conform to sound investment, lending, and funding practices, and avoid potential conflicts of interest.