I. INTRODUCTION
The FDIC's Division of Depositor and Consumer Protection has revised the classification system for citing violations identified during compliance examinations to better communicate to institutions the severity of violations and to provide more consistency in the classification of violations cited in Reports of Examination. Violations identified during an examination will be assigned to one of three levels based primarily on the impact to consumers. The change is intended to help focus the institution’s attention on the most significant issues identified during the examination and place violations that are more technical in nature in the appropriate perspective. This new three-level violation system replaces the current two-level system and will be used in examinations started on or after October 1, 2012.
The violations pages in the Compliance Report of Examination serve as the institution’s official record of violations identified during an examination. Because different types of violations present different levels of risk to consumers and to institutions, a method of classifying violations is necessary to communicate the FDIC’s level of concern regarding the violations identified. The FDIC has developed a system of classifying violations that replaces the previous two-level system, which designated violations as “Significant” or “Other.”
II. NEW CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
The classification of compliance violations is a three-level system that provides greater clarity to the institution regarding the severity of the violation. The three categories for violations are:
III. REPORT OF EXAMINATION TREATMENT
Level 3/High Severity or Level 2/Medium Severity violations will be described in the Report of Examination under distinct headers, with Level 3 Violations appearing first on the violations pages. The discussion of these violations will include institution management’s response to each violation. Level 1/Low Severity violations will be listed with a blanket statement indicating management’s actions or intentions to address the noted violations. Level 1 violations that are adequately addressed during the examination and that do not indicate weakness in the compliance management system will not be listed in the Report of Examination.
IV. CONCLUSION
With this classification system and its presentation in the Report of Examination, the FDIC seeks to address concerns raised by the industry in post-examination surveys and during regulatory outreach events about the focus and portrayal of violations within the context of the examination findings. Institution management should find the new approach helpful as they strive to focus on areas of greatest concern and take prompt and appropriate corrective action.