I. INTRODUCTION
The Federal Banking Agencies have clarified the role of supervisory guidance in bank supervision, noting that it “does not have the force and effect of law.” The agencies affirmed that supervisory guidance is intended to outline expectations and general views regarding appropriate practices for a given subject area, and that they would not pursue enforcement actions based on it.
II. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SUPERVISORY GUIDANCE AND LAWS OR REGULATIONS
The agencies issue various types of supervisory guidance, including interagency statements, advisories, bulletins, policy statements, questions and answers, and frequently asked questions, to their respective supervised institutions. A law or regulation has the force and effect of law.1 Unlike a law or regulation, supervisory guidance does not have the force and effect of law, and the agencies do not take enforcement actions based on supervisory guidance. Rather, supervisory guidance outlines the agencies’ supervisory expectations or priorities and articulates the agencies’ general views regarding appropriate practices for a given subject area. Supervisory guidance often provides examples of practices that the agencies generally consider consistent with safety-and-soundness standards or other applicable laws and regulations, including those designed to protect consumers. Supervised institutions at times request supervisory guidance, and such guidance is important to provide insight to industry, as well as supervisory staff, in a transparent way that helps to ensure consistency in the supervisory approach.
III. ONGOING AGENCY EFFORTS TO CLARIFY THE ROLE OF SUPERVISORY GUIDANCE
The agencies are clarifying the following policies and practices related to supervisory guidance: